Students often start their dissertation piece slow. Nothing bad about such slow pace -- it’s normal, unless of course if deadlines are at it’s nearest deadliest post in students’ calendar. Besides, pace largely depends in students’ dissertation writing.
If they are currently writing some part of which they are highly confident, then expect them to write it fast. Excitement has that effect – speed. But students are seldom confident; most of the time, they are prodding like blind men: reading, researching, writing, and hoping that what they’re doing could be just right.
Good thing, dissertation has those parts that seldom require such uncertain mood. That part is none other than the dissertation literature review. A review of existing research bodies, the task is not as easy as it seems.
At this point of research and writing, students have to learn to properly filter research materials. They will need to be keen on details, and contents of significance to the ‘building’ of their dissertation’s historical part.
Hence, to avoid getting too overwhelmed, it might help that they set their standards and needs straight in the beginning. Some standards for the dissertation literature review may be inclusive of the following:
Needs, on the other hand, are dissertation topic-specific. It may range of:
These standards and needs are just a few sample metrics. A big bulk of standards is basically taken from students’ specifics. However, students should be careful in setting these as they don’t want to put restrictions that might fail to pay off later. To perfect these system of benchmarks (standards and needs), students would also need to present their list to their dissertation supervisor.
It is important that they take heed of their supervisor’s advice as these could guarantee wonders for students’ dissertation literature review. A successful review would mean students are ready to take on the rest of the dissertation piece. It would implicate that students have a good picture of what their discourse is about or going to be about. Moreover, it would entail the depth by which students comprehend the challenges that they will have to face.
You may want to read: UK Dissertation: Getting the Un-Ready Covered
If they are currently writing some part of which they are highly confident, then expect them to write it fast. Excitement has that effect – speed. But students are seldom confident; most of the time, they are prodding like blind men: reading, researching, writing, and hoping that what they’re doing could be just right.
Good thing, dissertation has those parts that seldom require such uncertain mood. That part is none other than the dissertation literature review. A review of existing research bodies, the task is not as easy as it seems.
At this point of research and writing, students have to learn to properly filter research materials. They will need to be keen on details, and contents of significance to the ‘building’ of their dissertation’s historical part.
Hence, to avoid getting too overwhelmed, it might help that they set their standards and needs straight in the beginning. Some standards for the dissertation literature review may be inclusive of the following:
- Date of research study’s publication
- Scope of dissertation topic
- Must be published in a specific locality or country
- Peer-reviewed
Needs, on the other hand, are dissertation topic-specific. It may range of:
- Study must contain methodologies that could be potentially good to adapt
- Research must also base from recent bodies
- Study needs to boldly exude multiple perspectives
These standards and needs are just a few sample metrics. A big bulk of standards is basically taken from students’ specifics. However, students should be careful in setting these as they don’t want to put restrictions that might fail to pay off later. To perfect these system of benchmarks (standards and needs), students would also need to present their list to their dissertation supervisor.
It is important that they take heed of their supervisor’s advice as these could guarantee wonders for students’ dissertation literature review. A successful review would mean students are ready to take on the rest of the dissertation piece. It would implicate that students have a good picture of what their discourse is about or going to be about. Moreover, it would entail the depth by which students comprehend the challenges that they will have to face.
You may want to read: UK Dissertation: Getting the Un-Ready Covered